UAN Q1 2014 FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
| |
R | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014
OR
| |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number: 001-35120
CVR Partners, LP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| |
Delaware | 56-2677689 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2277 Plaza Drive, Suite 500 | |
Sugar Land, Texas (Address of principal executive offices) | 77479 (Zip Code) |
(281) 207-3200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
There were 73,112,951 common units outstanding at April 30, 2014.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
For The Quarter Ended March 31, 2014
GLOSSARY OF SELECTED TERMS
The following are definitions of certain terms used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 (this “Report”):
|
| |
ammonia | Ammonia is a direct application fertilizer and is primarily used as a building block for other nitrogen products for industrial applications and finished fertilizer products. |
| |
capacity | Capacity is defined as the throughput a process unit is capable of sustaining, either on a calendar or stream day basis. The throughput may be expressed in terms of maximum sustainable, nameplate or economic capacity. The maximum sustainable or nameplate capacities may not be the most economical. The economic capacity is the throughput that generally provides the greatest economic benefit based on considerations such as feedstock costs, product values and downstream unit constraints. |
| |
catalyst | A substance that alters, accelerates, or instigates chemical changes, but is neither produced, consumed nor altered in the process. |
| |
Coffeyville Resources or CRLLC | Coffeyville Resources, LLC, the subsidiary of CVR Energy which directly owns our general partner and 38,920,000 common units, or approximately 53% of our common units. |
| |
common units | Common units representing limited partner interests of CVR Partners, LP. |
| |
corn belt | The primary corn producing region of the United States, which includes Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio and Wisconsin. |
| |
CVR Energy | CVR Energy, Inc., a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “CVI,” which indirectly owns our general partner and the common units owned by CRLLC. |
| |
CVR Refining | CVR Refining, LP, a publicly traded limited partnership listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “CVRR,” which currently owns and operates a complex full coking medium-sour crude oil refinery with a rated capacity of 115,000 barrels per calendar day (bpcd) in Coffeyville, Kansas, a medium complexity crude oil refinery with a rated capacity of 70,000 bpcd in Wynnewood, Oklahoma and ancillary businesses. |
| |
farm belt | Refers to the states of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas and Wisconsin. |
| |
feedstocks | Petroleum coke and petroleum products (such as crude oil and natural gas liquids) that are processed and blended into refined products, such as gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel, which are produced by a refinery. |
| |
general partner | CVR GP, LLC, our general partner, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of CRLLC. |
| |
Initial Public Offering | The initial public offering of CVR Partners, LP common units that closed on April 13, 2011. |
| |
MMbtu | One million British thermal units: a measure of energy. One Btu of heat is required to raise the temperature of one pound of water one degree Fahrenheit. |
| |
MSCF | One thousand standard cubic feet, a customary gas measurement. |
| |
on-stream | Measurement of the reliability of the gasification, ammonia and UAN units, defined as the total number of hours operated by each unit divided by the total number of hours in the reporting period. |
| |
pet coke | Petroleum coke - a coal-like substance that is produced during the oil refining process. |
| |
plant gate price | The unit price of fertilizer, in dollars per ton, offered on a delivered basis, and excluding shipment costs. |
| |
prepaid sales | Represents customer payments under contracts to guarantee a price and supply of fertilizer in quantities expected to be delivered in the next twelve months. Revenue is not recorded for such sales until the product is considered delivered. Prepaid sales are also referred to as deferred revenue. |
|
| |
| |
Secondary Offering | The registered public offering of 12,000,000 common units of CVR Partners, LP, by CRLLC, which closed on May 28, 2013. |
| |
ton | One ton is equal to 2,000 pounds. |
| |
throughput | The volume processed through a unit. |
| |
turnaround | A periodically required standard procedure to refurbish and maintain a facility that involves the shutdown and inspection of major processing units. |
| |
UAN | UAN is an aqueous solution of urea and ammonium nitrate used as a fertilizer. |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
| (unaudited) | | |
| (in thousands, except unit data) |
ASSETS | | | |
Current assets: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 85,919 |
| | $ | 85,142 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $55 and $50, at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively | 10,622 |
| | 7,549 |
|
Inventories | 33,535 |
| | 33,064 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets, including $2,182 and $3,104 from affiliates at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively | 8,759 |
| | 10,025 |
|
Total current assets | 138,835 |
| | 135,780 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation | 409,121 |
| | 412,956 |
|
Goodwill | 40,969 |
| | 40,969 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net | 998 |
| | 1,236 |
|
Other long-term assets, including $1,091 and $1,136 with affiliates at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively | 2,692 |
| | 2,513 |
|
Total assets | $ | 592,615 |
| | $ | 593,454 |
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | |
Accounts payable, including $2,924 and $4,289 due to affiliates at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively | $ | 14,062 |
| | $ | 17,137 |
|
Personnel accruals, including $146 and $2,025 with affiliates at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively | 2,271 |
| | 4,494 |
|
Deferred revenue | 9,965 |
| | 696 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities, including $1,643 and $323 with affiliates at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively | 10,170 |
| | 5,059 |
|
Total current liabilities | 36,468 |
| | 27,386 |
|
Long-term liabilities: | | | |
Long-term debt, net of current portion | 125,000 |
| | 125,000 |
|
Other long-term liabilities, including $17 and $67 with affiliates at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively | 878 |
| | 1,147 |
|
Total long-term liabilities | 125,878 |
| | 126,147 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
| |
|
|
Partners’ capital: | | | |
Common unitholders, 73,112,951 units issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 | 431,994 |
| | 441,819 |
|
General partner interest | 1 |
| | 1 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,726 | ) | | (1,899) |
Total partners’ capital | 430,269 |
| | 439,921 |
|
Total liabilities and partners’ capital | $ | 592,615 |
| | $ | 593,454 |
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
| (unaudited) |
| (in thousands, except per unit data) |
Net sales | $ | 80,316 |
| | $ | 81,411 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: | | | |
Cost of product sold — Affiliates | 2,246 |
| | 3,089 |
|
Cost of product sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) — Third parties | 19,462 |
| | 7,565 |
|
| 21,708 |
| | 10,654 |
|
Direct operating expenses — Affiliates | 753 |
| | 1,003 |
|
Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) — Third parties | 23,436 |
| | 21,554 |
|
| 24,189 |
| | 22,557 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) — Affiliates | 3,536 |
| | 4,219 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) — Third parties | 1,118 |
| | 1,411 |
|
| 4,654 |
| | 5,630 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 6,667 |
| | 5,767 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses | 57,218 |
| | 44,608 |
|
Operating income | 23,098 |
| | 36,803 |
|
Other income (expense): | | | |
Interest expense and other financing costs | (1,659 | ) | | (1,280 | ) |
Interest income | 6 |
| | 30 |
|
Other income, net | 15 |
| | 9 |
|
Total other expense | (1,638 | ) | | (1,241 | ) |
Income before income tax expense | 21,460 |
| | 35,562 |
|
Income tax expense | 7 |
| | 9 |
|
Net income | $ | 21,453 |
| | $ | 35,553 |
|
Net income per common unit – basic | $ | 0.29 |
| | $ | 0.49 |
|
Net income per common unit – diluted | $ | 0.29 |
| | $ | 0.49 |
|
Weighted-average common units outstanding: | | | |
Basic | 73,113 |
| | 73,065 |
|
Diluted | 73,145 |
| | 73,223 |
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
| (unaudited) |
| (in thousands) |
Net income | | $ | 21,453 |
| | $ | 35,553 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | |
Change in fair value of interest rate swap | | (95 | ) | | (46 | ) |
Net loss reclassified into income on settlement of interest rate swap | | 268 |
| | 258 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | 173 |
| | 212 |
|
Total comprehensive income | | $ | 21,626 |
| | $ | 35,765 |
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common Units | | General Partner Interest | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) | | Total |
| Issued | | Amount | | | |
| (unaudited) |
| (in thousands, except unit data) |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | 73,112,951 |
| | $ | 441,819 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | (1,899 | ) | | $ | 439,921 |
|
Cash distributions to common unitholders – Affiliates | — |
| | (16,736 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (16,736 | ) |
Cash distributions to common unitholders – Non-affiliates | — |
| | (14,703 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (14,703 | ) |
Share-based compensation – Affiliates | — |
| | 161 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 161 |
|
Net income | — |
| | 21,453 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21,453 |
|
Net gains (losses) on interest rate swaps | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 173 |
| | 173 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2014 | 73,112,951 |
| | $ | 431,994 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | (1,726 | ) | | $ | 430,269 |
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
| (unaudited) |
| (in thousands) |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | |
Net income | $ | 21,453 |
| | $ | 35,553 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 6,667 |
| | 5,767 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts | 5 |
| | (14 | ) |
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 238 |
| | 238 |
|
Share-based compensation – Affiliates | 786 |
| | 1,186 |
|
Share-based compensation | 147 |
| | 93 |
|
Change in assets and liabilities: | | | |
Accounts receivable | (3,078 | ) | | (4,601 | ) |
Inventories | (471 | ) | | (3,275 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 1,266 |
| | (229 | ) |
Other long-term assets | (182 | ) | | (82 | ) |
Accounts payable | (3,895 | ) | | (3,497 | ) |
Deferred revenue | 9,269 |
| | 27,639 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 3,445 |
| | (1,229 | ) |
Other long-term liabilities | (49 | ) | | (64 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 35,601 |
| | 57,485 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | |
Capital expenditures | (3,385 | ) | | (18,063 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | (3,385 | ) | | (18,063 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | |
Cash distributions to common unitholders – Affiliates | (16,736 | ) | | (9,776 | ) |
Cash distributions to common unitholders – Non-affiliates | (14,703 | ) | | (4,252 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | (31,439 | ) | | (14,028 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 777 |
| | 25,394 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 85,142 |
| | 127,848 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 85,919 |
| | $ | 153,242 |
|
Supplemental disclosures: | | | |
Cash paid for income taxes | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 6 |
|
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest of $35 and $422 in 2014 and 2013, respectively | $ | 1,440 |
| | $ | 1,064 |
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: | | | |
Construction in progress additions included in accounts payable | $ | 1,309 |
| | $ | 10,176 |
|
Change in accounts payable related to construction in progress | $ | (556 | ) | | $ | (8,495 | ) |
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2014
(unaudited)
(1) Formation of the Partnership, Organization and Nature of Business
Organization
CVR Partners, LP (referred to as "CVR Partners" or the "Partnership") is a Delaware limited partnership, formed in June 2007 by CVR Energy, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, but excluding the Partnership and its subsidiaries, "CVR Energy") to own Coffeyville Resources Nitrogen Fertilizers, LLC ("CRNF"). CRNF is an independent producer and marketer of upgraded nitrogen fertilizer products sold in North America. CRNF operates a dual-train coke gasifier plant that produces high-purity hydrogen, most of which is subsequently converted to ammonia and upgraded to urea ammonium nitrate ("UAN").
CRNF produces and distributes nitrogen fertilizer products, which are used primarily by farmers to improve the yield and quality of their crops. CRNF's principal products are UAN and ammonia. These products are manufactured at CRNF's facility in Coffeyville, Kansas. CRNF's product sales are heavily weighted toward UAN and all of its products are sold on a wholesale basis.
Operation of Partnership
Subsequent to the closing of the Partnership's initial public offering (the "Initial Public Offering"), in April 2011 and through May 27, 2013, public security holders held approximately 30% of the Partnership's common units and Coffeyville Resources, LLC ("CRLLC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of CVR Energy, held approximately 70% of the Partnership's common units and the general partner interest. As of March 31, 2014, IEP Energy LLC and certain affiliates (collectively "IEP") owned approximately 82% of the shares of CVR Energy.
On May 28, 2013, CRLLC sold 12,000,000 of our common units to the public at a price of $25.15 per unit in a registered public offering (the "Secondary Offering"). The net proceeds to CRLLC from the Secondary Offering were approximately $292.6 million, after deducting approximately $9.2 million in underwriting discounts and commissions. We did not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of common units by CRLLC.
Subsequent to the closing of the Secondary Offering and as of March 31, 2014, public security holders held approximately 47% of the Partnership's common units and CRLLC held approximately 53% of the Partnership's common units and the general partner interest.
CVR GP, LLC (“CVR GP” or the “general partner”) manages and operates the Partnership. Common unitholders have only limited voting rights on matters affecting the Partnership. In addition, common unitholders have no right to elect the general partner's directors on an annual or continuing basis.
The Partnership is operated by a combination of the general partner's senior management team and CVR Energy's senior management team pursuant to a services agreement among CVR Energy, CVR GP and the Partnership. In October 2007, the Partnership's partners at that time entered into an amended and restated limited partnership agreement setting forth their various rights and responsibilities. The Partnership also entered into a number of agreements with CVR Energy and CVR GP to regulate certain business relations between the Partnership and the other parties thereto. See Note 12 ("Related Party Transactions") for further discussion.
(2) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Partnership condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CVR Partners and CRNF, its wholly-owned subsidiary. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including Article 3 of Regulation S-X, “General Instructions as to Consolidated Financial Statements.” These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the December 31, 2013 audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
March 31, 2014
(unaudited)
CVR Partners’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, which was filed with the SEC on February 26, 2014 (the "2013 Form 10-K").
The condensed consolidated financial statements include certain selling, general and administrative expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) and direct operating expenses that CVR Energy incurred on behalf of the Partnership. These related party transactions are governed by the services agreement. See Note 12 ("Related Party Transactions") for additional discussion of the services agreement and billing and allocation of certain costs. The amounts charged or allocated to the Partnership are not necessarily indicative of the cost that the Partnership would have incurred had it operated as an independent entity.
In the opinion of the Partnership’s management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that are necessary to fairly present the financial position of the Partnership as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the results of operations and comprehensive income of the Partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the cash flows of the Partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 and the changes in partners’ capital for the Partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2014.
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Results of operations and cash flows are not necessarily indicative of the results that will be realized for the year ending December 31, 2014, or any other interim or annual period.
(3) Share‑Based Compensation
Certain employees of CVR Partners and employees of CVR Energy who perform services for the Partnership participate in equity compensation plans of CVR Partners' affiliates. Accordingly, CVR Partners has recorded compensation expense for these plans in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") Topic 1-B (“Allocations of Expenses and Related Disclosures in Financial
Statements of Subsidiaries, Divisions or Lesser Business Components of Another Entity”) and in accordance with guidance regarding the accounting for share-based compensation granted to employees of an equity method investee. All compensation expense related to these plans for full-time employees of CVR Partners has been allocated 100% to the Partnership. For employees of CVR Energy, the Partnership records share-based compensation relative to the percentage of time spent by each employee providing services to the Partnership as compared to the total calculated share-based compensation by CVR Energy. The Partnership is not responsible for
payment of the allocated share-based compensation for certain plans as discussed below. Allocated expense amounts related to plans for which the Partnership is not responsible for payment are reflected as an increase or decrease to partners' capital.
Long-Term Incentive Plan – CVR Energy
CVR Energy has a Long-Term Incentive Plan (“CVR Energy LTIP”) that permits the grant of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted stock units, dividend equivalent rights, share awards and performance awards (including performance share units, performance units and performance based restricted stock). As of March 31, 2014, only grants of restricted stock units and performance units under the CVR Energy LTIP remain outstanding. Individuals who are eligible to receive awards and grants under the CVR Energy LTIP include CVR Energy’s or its subsidiaries’ (including the Partnership) employees, officers, consultants and directors.
Restricted Stock Units
Through the CVR Energy LTIP, restricted shares have been granted to employees of CVR Energy and the Partnership. The IEP acquisition of CVR Energy and related Transaction Agreement dated April 18, 2012 between CVR Energy and IEP (“Transaction Agreement”) triggered a modification to outstanding awards under the CVR Energy LTIP. Pursuant to the Transaction Agreement, restricted shares scheduled to vest in 2013, 2014 and 2015 were converted to restricted stock units whereby the awards will be settled in cash upon vesting in an amount equal to the lesser of the offer price of $30.00 per share or the fair market value as determined at the most recent valuation date of December 31 of each year. The awards, which generally vest over a three-year period, will be remeasured at each subsequent reporting date until they vest.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
March 31, 2014
(unaudited)
In December 2012 and during 2013, restricted stock units and dividend equivalent rights were granted to certain employees of CVR Energy and its subsidiaries (including the Partnership). The awards are scheduled to vest over three years, with one-third of the award vesting each year with the exception of awards granted to certain executive officers scheduled to vest over one year. Awards granted in December 2012 to Mr. Lipinski, CVR Energy's Chief Executive Officer and President, were canceled in connection with the issuance of certain performance unit awards as discussed further below. Each restricted stock unit and dividend equivalent right represents the right to receive, upon vesting, a cash payment equal to (a) the fair market value of one share of CVR Energy's common stock, plus (b) the cash value of all dividends declared and paid per share of CVR Energy's common stock from the grant date to and including the vesting date. The awards will be remeasured at each subsequent reporting date until they vest.
Assuming the allocation of costs from CVR Energy remains consistent with the allocation percentages in place at March 31, 2014, there was approximately $0.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock units and associated dividend equivalent rights to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.1 years. Inclusion of a vesting table would not be meaningful due to changes in allocation percentages that occur from time to time. The unrecognized compensation expense has been determined by the number of restricted stock units and associated dividend equivalent rights and respective allocation percentage for individuals for whom, as of March 31, 2014, compensation expense has been allocated to the Partnership. Compensation expense recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, related to the awards, was approximately $16,000 and $0.6 million, respectively. The Partnership is not responsible for the payment of CVR Energy restricted stock units and associated dividend equivalent rights, and accordingly, the expenses recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 have been reflected as an increase to partners' capital.
Performance Unit Awards
In December 2013, CVR Energy entered into Performance Unit Award Agreements with Mr. Lipinski. Certain of the Performance Unit Awards were entered into in connection with the cancellation of Mr. Lipinski's December 2012 restricted stock unit award, as discussed above. In accordance with accounting guidance related to the modification of share-based and other compensatory award arrangements, CVR Energy concluded that the cancellation and concurrent issuance of the performance awards created a substantive service period from the original grant date of the December 2012 restricted stock unit award through the end of the performance period for the related performance awards. Compensation cost for the related awards is being recognized over the substantive service period. Compensation expense recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2014 related to the performance unit awards was $0.4 million. The Partnership will be responsible for reimbursing CVR Energy for its allocated portion of the performance unit awards. As of March 31, 2014 this obligation of $0.7 million is recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Incentive Unit Awards
In December 2013, CVR Energy granted awards of incentive units and distribution equivalent rights to certain employees of CRLLC and CVR Energy who provide shared services to CVR Energy and its subsidiaries (including the Partnership). The awards are expected to vest over three years, with one-third of the award vesting each year. Each incentive unit and distribution equivalent right represents the right to receive, upon vesting, a cash payment equal to (a) the average fair market value of one common unit of CVR Refining, LP ("CVR Refining") for the first ten trading days in the month of vesting, plus (b) the per unit cash value of all distributions declared and paid by CVR Refining from the grant date to and including the vesting date. The awards, which are liability-classified, will be remeasured at each subsequent reporting date until they vest.
Assuming the allocation of costs from CVR Energy remains consistent with the allocation percentages in place at December 31, 2013, there was approximately $0.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the incentive units and associated distribution equivalent rights to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.7 years. Inclusion of a vesting table would not be meaningful due to changes in allocation percentages that occur from time to time. The unrecognized compensation expense has been determined by the number of incentive units and associated distribution equivalent rights and respective allocation percentage for individuals for whom, as of March 31, 2014, compensation expense has been allocated to the Partnership. Compensation expense recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2014 related to the awards was $0.1 million. The Partnership will be responsible for reimbursing CVR Energy for its allocated portion of the awards. As of March 31, 2014 this obligation of $0.1 million is recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
March 31, 2014
(unaudited)
Long-Term Incentive Plan – CVR Partners
In connection with the Initial Public Offering, the board of directors of the general partner adopted the CVR Partners, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan ("CVR Partners LTIP"). Individuals who are eligible to receive awards under the CVR Partners LTIP include (1) employees of the Partnership and its subsidiaries, (2) employees of the general partner, (3) members of the board of directors of the general partner, and (4) CVR Partners' parent's employees, consultants and directors. The CVR Partners LTIP provides for the grant of options, unit appreciation rights, distribution equivalent rights, restricted units, phantom units and other unit-based awards, each in respect of common units. Through the CVR Partners LTIP, phantom and common units have been awarded to employees of the Partnership and the general partner and to members of the board of directors of the general partner. Phantom unit awards made to employees and members of the board of directors of the general partner are considered a non-employee equity based award and are required to be marked-to-market each reporting period until they vest. Awards to employees of the Partnership and the general partner vest over a three year period and awards to members of the board of directors of the general partner generally vest immediately on the grant date. The maximum number of common units issuable under the CVR Partners LTIP is 5,000,000. As of March 31, 2014, there were 4,809,862 common units available for issuance under the CVR Partners LTIP.
In December 2012, the board of directors of the general partner approved an amendment to modify the terms of certain phantom unit awards granted to employees of the Partnership and its subsidiaries. Prior to the amendment, the phantom units, when granted, were valued at the closing market price of the Partnership's common units on the date of issuance and amortized to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the units. These phantom units generally vest over a three-year period. The amendment triggered a modification to the awards by providing that the phantom units would be settled in cash rather than in common units of the Partnership. For awards vesting subsequent to the amendment, the awards will be remeasured at each subsequent reporting date until they vest. As a result of the modification of the awards, the classification changed from equity-classified awards to liability-classified awards.
In December 2013, awards of phantom units and distribution equivalent rights were granted to certain employees of the Partnership and its subsidiaries' employees and the employees of the general partner. The awards are expected to vest over three years on the basis of one-third of the award each year. Each phantom unit and distribution equivalent right represents the right to receive, upon vesting, a cash payment equal to (a) the fair market value of one unit of the Partnership's common unit, plus (b) the per unit cash value of all distributions declared and paid by the Partnership from the grant date to and including the vesting date. The awards, which are liability-classified, will be remeasured at each subsequent reporting date until they vest.
A summary of the common units and phantom units (collectively “Units”) activity during the three months ended March 31, 2014 is presented below:
|
| | | | | | |
| Units | | Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Non-vested at January 1, 2014 | 171,119 | | $ | 21.34 |
|
Granted | — |
| | — |
|
Vested | — |
| | — |
|
Forfeited | (64,629 | ) | | 23.36 |
|
Non-vested at March 31, 2014 | 106,490 |
| | $ | 20.12 |
|
Unrecognized compensation expense associated with the unvested common and phantom units at March 31, 2014 was approximately $1.4 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years. In conjunction with Mr. Kelley's resignation that was effective January 1, 2014, all awards granted to him that were non-vested at the resignation date were forfeited. Due to the timing of this event, the Partnership had reflected the impact of this event in determining the unrecognized compensation expense as the resignation was expected at December 31, 2013. The associated change to the non-vested units forfeited was reflected at the resignation date and is included in the summary presented above. Compensation expense recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 related to the awards under the CVR Partners LTIP was approximately $0.4 million and $0.6
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
March 31, 2014
(unaudited)
million, respectively. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 the Partnership had a liability of $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively, for cash settled non-vested phantom unit awards and associated distribution equivalent rights, which is recorded in personnel accruals on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(4) Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
| (in thousands) |
Finished goods | $ | 10,995 |
| | $ | 8,849 |
|
Raw materials and precious metals | 8,120 |
| | 8,546 |
|
Parts and supplies | 14,420 |
| | 15,669 |
|
| $ | 33,535 |
| | $ | 33,064 |
|
(5) Property, Plant, and Equipment
A summary of costs for property, plant, and equipment is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
| (in thousands) |
Land and improvements | $ | 5,026 |
| | $ | 5,032 |
|
Buildings and improvements | 2,237 |
| | 2,191 |
|
Machinery and equipment | 549,156 |
| | 548,282 |
|
Automotive equipment | 450 |
| | 450 |
|
Furniture and fixtures | 888 |
| | 893 |
|
Railcars | 7,902 |
| | 7,902 |
|
Construction in progress | 7,206 |
| | 5,294 |
|
| $ | 572,865 |
| | $ | 570,044 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation | 163,744 |
| | 157,088 |
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 409,121 |
| | $ | 412,956 |
|
Capitalized interest recognized as a reduction of interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 totaled approximately $35,000 and $0.4 million, respectively.
Direct operating expenses exclude depreciation and amortization of approximately $6.6 million and $5.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
(6) Partners’ Capital and Partnership Distributions
The Partnership has two types of partnership interests outstanding:
| |
• | a general partner interest, which is not entitled to any distributions, and which is held by the general partner. |
At March 31, 2014, the Partnership had a total of 73,112,951 common units issued and outstanding, of which 38,920,000 common units were owned by CRLLC, representing approximately 53% of the total Partnership units outstanding.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
March 31, 2014
(unaudited)
The board of directors of the Partnership's general partner has adopted a policy for the Partnership to distribute all available cash generated on a quarterly basis. Cash distributions will be made to the common unitholders of record on the applicable record date, generally within 60 days after the end of each quarter. Available cash for each quarter will be determined by the board of directors of the general partner following the end of such quarter.
Available cash for each quarter will generally begin with Adjusted EBITDA reduced for cash needed for: (i) net interest expense (excluding capitalized interest) and debt service and other contractual obligations; (ii) maintenance capital expenditures; and (iii) to the extent applicable, major scheduled turnaround expense incurred and reserves for future operating or capital needs that the board of directors of the general partner deems necessary or appropriate, if any. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA (net income before interest expense, net, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization) further adjusted for the impact of non-cash share-based compensation, and, where applicable, major scheduled turnaround expense and loss on disposition of assets. Available cash for distributions may be increased by previously established cash reserves, if any, at the discretion of the board of directors of our general partner.
On March 10, 2014, the Partnership paid out a cash distribution to the Partnership's unitholders of record on the close of business on March 3, 2014 for the fourth quarter of 2013 in the amount of $0.43 per common unit, or $31.4 million in aggregate.
On April 30, 2014, the Board of Directors of the general partner of the Partnership declared a cash distribution for the first quarter of 2014 in the amount of $0.38 per common unit, or $27.8 million in aggregate. The cash distribution will be paid on May 19, 2014 to the Partnership's unitholders of record at the close of business on May 12, 2014.
(7) Net Income per Common Unit
The Partnership's net income is allocated wholly to the common units as the general partner does not have an economic interest. Basic and diluted net income per common unit is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common units outstanding during the period and, when applicable, gives effect to phantom units and unvested common units granted under the CVR Partners LTIP. The common units issued during the period are included on a weighted-average basis for the days in which they were outstanding.
(8) Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
| (in thousands) |
Property taxes | $ | 1,815 |
| | $ | 1,373 |
|
Current interest rate swap | 930 |
| | 883 |
|
Accrued interest | 439 |
| | 458 |
|
Other accrued expenses and liabilities (1) | 6,986 |
| | 2,345 |
|
| $ | 10,170 |
| | $ | 5,059 |
|
____________
| |
(1) | Other accrued expenses and liabilities include amounts owed by the Partnership to Coffeyville Resources Refining & Marketing, LLC (“CRRM”), a related party, under the feedstock and shared services agreement. Refer to Note 12 ("Related Party Transactions") for additional discussion. |
(9) Credit Facility
The Partnership's credit facility includes a term loan facility of $125.0 million and a revolving credit facility of $25.0 million with an uncommitted incremental facility of up to $50.0 million. No amounts were outstanding under the revolving credit facility at March 31, 2014. There is no scheduled amortization and the credit facility matures in April 2016.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
March 31, 2014
(unaudited)
Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at either a Eurodollar rate or a base rate plus in either case a margin based on a pricing grid determined by the trailing four quarter leverage ratio. The margin for borrowings under the credit facility ranges from 3.50% to 4.25% for Eurodollar loans and 2.50% to 3.25% for base rate loans. Currently, the interest rate is either the Eurodollar rate plus a margin of 3.50% or, for base rate loans, the prime rate plus 2.50%. Under its terms, the lenders under the credit facility were granted a first priority security interest (subject to certain customary exceptions) in substantially all of the assets of CVR Partners and CRNF.
The credit facility requires CVR Partners to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio and contains customary covenants for a financing of this type. The credit facility provides that the Partnership can make distributions to holders of the Partnership's common units provided the Partnership is in compliance with its leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio covenants on a pro forma basis after giving effect to such distribution and there is no default or event of default under the facility. As of March 31, 2014, CVR Partners was in compliance with the covenants contained in the credit facility.
(10) Interest Rate Swap Agreements
CRNF is subject to two floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements for the purpose of hedging the interest rate risk associated with a portion of its $125.0 million floating rate term debt which matures in April 2016. See Note 9 ("Credit Facility"). The aggregate notional amount covered under these agreements, which commenced on August 12, 2011 and expire on February 12, 2016, totals $62.5 million (split evenly between the two agreement dates). Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement entered into on June 30, 2011, CRNF will receive a floating rate based on three month LIBOR and pay a fixed rate of 1.94%. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement entered into on July 1, 2011, CRNF will receive a floating rate based on three month LIBOR and pay a fixed rate of 1.975%. Both swap agreements are settled every 90 days. The effect of these swap agreements is to lock in a fixed rate of interest of approximately 1.96% plus the applicable margin paid to lenders over three month LIBOR as calculated under the credit facility. At March 31, 2014, the effective rate was approximately 4.56%. The agreements were designated as cash flow hedges at inception, and accordingly, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the swap is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) and will be reclassified into interest expense when the interest rate swap transaction affects earnings. Any ineffective portion of the gain or loss will be recognized immediately in interest expense. The realized loss on the interest rate swap reclassified from AOCI into interest expense and other financing costs on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations was $0.3 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The interest rate swap agreements held by the Partnership also provide for the right to setoff. However, as the interest rate swaps are in a liability position, there are no amounts offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
March 31, 2014
(unaudited)
(11) Commitments and Contingencies
Leases and Unconditional Purchase Obligations
The minimum required payments for the Partnership’s operating leases and unconditional purchase obligations are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Operating Leases | | Unconditional Purchase Obligations(1) |
| (in thousands) |
Nine months ending December 31, 2014 | $ | 4,060 |
| | $ | 15,245 |
|
Year ending December 31, 2015 | 5,191 |
| | 14,002 |
|
Year ending December 31, 2016 | 4,466 |
| | 14,253 |
|
Year ending December 31, 2017 | 2,827 |
| | 14,547 |
|
Year ending December 31, 2018 | 2,014 |
| | 14,505 |
|
Thereafter | 4,917 |
| | 94,227 |
|
| $ | 23,475 |
| | $ | 166,779 |
|
_____________
| |
(1) | This includes the Partnership’s purchase obligation for pet coke from CVR Refining and has been derived from a calculation of the average pet coke price paid to CVR Refining over the preceding two year period. |
CRNF leases railcars and facilities under long-term operating leases. Lease expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 totaled approximately $1.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The lease agreements have various remaining terms. Some agreements are renewable, at CRNF’s option, for additional periods. It is expected, in the ordinary course of business, that leases will be renewed or replaced as they expire.
CRNF has an agreement with the City of Coffeyville pursuant to which it must make a series of future payments for the supply, generation and transmission of electricity based upon agreed upon rates. This agreement expires on July 1, 2019.
During 2005, CRNF entered into the Amended and Restated On-Site Product Supply Agreement with The BOC Group, Inc. (as predecessor in interest to Linde LLC). Pursuant to the agreement, which expires in 2020, CRNF is required to take as available and pay approximately $0.3 million to $0.4 million per month, which amount is subject to annual inflation adjustments, for the supply of oxygen and nitrogen to the fertilizer operation. Expenses associated with this agreement are included in direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) and for both the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 totaled approximately $1.0 million.
The Partnership entered into a pet coke supply agreement with HollyFrontier Corporation. The term of this agreement ends in December 2014 and may be renewed. Expenses related to the pet coke supply agreement totaled approximately $1.3 million and $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which are recorded in cost of product sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization).
Litigation
From time to time, the Partnership is involved in various lawsuits arising in the normal course of business, including matters such as those described below under "Environmental, Health, and Safety ("EHS") Matters." Liabilities related to such litigation are recognized when the related costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. It is possible that management’s estimates of the outcomes will change due to uncertainties inherent in litigation and settlement negotiations. Except as described below, there were no new proceedings or material developments in proceedings that we previously reported in our 2013 Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of any other litigation matters are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
March 31, 2014
(unaudited)
statements. There can be no assurance that management’s beliefs or opinions with respect to liability for potential litigation matters are accurate.
Environmental, Health, and Safety (“EHS”) Matters
CRNF is subject to various stringent federal, state, and local EHS rules and regulations. Liabilities related to EHS matters are recognized when the related costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated. Estimates of these costs are based upon currently available facts, existing technology, site-specific costs, and currently enacted laws and regulations. In reporting EHS liabilities, no offset is made for potential recoveries.
CRNF owns and operates a facility utilized for the manufacture of nitrogen fertilizers. Therefore, CRNF has exposure to potential EHS liabilities related to past and present EHS conditions at this location. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and related state laws, certain persons may be liable for the release or threatened release of hazardous substances. These persons can include the current owner or operator of property where a release or threatened release occurred, any persons who owned or operated the property when the release occurred, and any persons who disposed of, or arranged for the transportation or disposal of, hazardous substances at a contaminated property. Liability under CERCLA is strict, and under certain circumstances, joint and several, so that any responsible party may be held liable for the entire cost of investigating and remediating the release of hazardous substances.
CRNF is also subject to extensive and frequently changing federal, state and local, environmental and health and safety laws and regulations governing the emission and release of hazardous substances into the environment, the treatment and discharge of waste water, and the storage, handling, use and transportation of nitrogen products. The ultimate impact of complying with evolving laws and regulations is not always clearly known or determinable due in part to the fact that our operations may change over time and certain implementing regulations for laws, such as the federal Clean Air Act, have not yet been finalized, are under governmental or judicial review or are being revised. These laws and regulations could result in increased capital, operating and compliance costs.
There have been no new developments or material changes to the environmental accruals or expected capital expenditures related to compliance with the foregoing environmental matters from those provided in our 2013 Form 10-K. CRNF believes it is in substantial compliance with existing EHS rules and regulations. There can be no assurance that the EHS matters described or referenced herein or other EHS matters which may develop in the future will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's business, financial condition, or results of operations.
EHS expenditures are capitalized when such expenditures are expected to result in future economic benefits. EHS capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were approximately $57,000 and $0, respectively. These expenditures were incurred for environmental compliance and efficiency of the operations.
(12) Related Party Transactions
Related Party Agreements
In connection with the formation of CVR Partners and the initial public offering of CVR Energy in October 2007, CVR Partners and CRNF entered into several agreements with CVR Energy and its subsidiaries (including CRRM) that govern the business relations among CVR Partners, its general partner and CRNF on the one hand, and CVR Energy and its subsidiaries, on the other hand. Certain of the agreements described below were subsequently amended and restated. Amounts owed to CVR Partners and CRNF from CVR Energy and its subsidiaries with respect to these agreements are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets, and other long-term assets, on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Conversely, amounts owed to CVR Energy and its subsidiaries by CVR Partners and CRNF with respect to these agreements are included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and other long-term liabilities, on the Partnership's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
March 31, 2014
(unaudited)
CVR Refining completed its initial public offering (the "Refining Partnership IPO") in January 2013. CVR Energy currently indirectly owns the general partner of CVR Refining and the majority of CVR Refining's outstanding common units. Although certain of CVR Energy's subsidiaries that are parties to the related party agreements discussed below were contributed to CVR Refining in connection with the Refining Partnership IPO and are now subsidiaries of CVR Refining, the Refining Partnership IPO had no impact on the Partnership's business relations with these subsidiaries.
Feedstock and Shared Services Agreement
CRNF entered into a feedstock and shared services agreement with CRRM which was most recently amended in December 2013, under which the two parties provide feedstock and other services to one another. These feedstocks and services are utilized in the respective production processes of CRRM's Coffeyville, Kansas refinery and CRNF's nitrogen fertilizer plant.
Pursuant to the feedstock and shared services agreement, CRNF and CRRM have agreed to transfer hydrogen to one another; provided, CRNF is not required to sell hydrogen to CRRM if such hydrogen is required for operation of CRNF's nitrogen fertilizer plant, if such sale would adversely affect the Partnership's classification as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, or if such sale would not be in CRNF's best interest. Net monthly sales of hydrogen to CRRM have been reflected as net sales for CVR Partners. Net monthly receipts of hydrogen from CRRM have been reflected in cost of product sold for CVR Partners. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the net sales generated from the sale of hydrogen to CRRM were approximately $5.9 million and $29,000, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, CVR Partners also recognized $0 and $0.2 million, respectively, of cost of product sold related to the transfer of excess hydrogen from the Coffeyville refinery. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were approximately $1.9 million and $2.6 million, respectively, of receivables included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets associated with unpaid balances related to hydrogen sales.
CRNF is also obligated to make available to CRRM any nitrogen produced by the Linde air separation plant that is not required for the operation of the nitrogen fertilizer plant, as determined by CRNF in a commercially reasonable manner. Reimbursed direct operating expenses associated with nitrogen for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, were approximately $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively. No amounts were paid by CRNF to CRRM for any of the periods presented.
The agreement also provides a mechanism pursuant to which CRNF transfers a tail gas stream to CRRM. CRNF receives the benefit of eliminating a waste gas stream and recovers the fuel value of the tail gas system. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, there were net sales of approximately $1,000 and $0.1 million, respectively, generated from the sale of tail gas to CRRM.
In April 2011, in connection with the tail gas stream transfers to CRRM, CRRM installed a pipe between the Coffeyville, Kansas refinery and the nitrogen fertilizer plant to transfer the tail gas. CRNF agreed to pay CRRM the cost of installing the pipe over the next three years and, in 2014, provide an additional 15% to cover the cost of capital. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were assets of approximately $0.2 million and $0.2 million included in other current assets, approximately $1.1 million and $1.1 million included in other non-current assets, an offset liability of approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million in other current liabilities and approximately $17,000 and $0.1 million of other non-current liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
When CRNF retains excess sulfur from its operations, CRRM agrees to handle such sulfur in exchange for a fee payable to transport, store and sell the excess sulfur when possible. CRRM reimburses CRNF for any excess in the sales price of the sulfur above its costs. Approximately $83,000 and $34,000 were reimbursed by CRRM for the sale of excess sulfur for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. These reimbursements were recorded as reductions to direct operating expenses.
The agreement has an initial term of 20 years, which will be automatically extended for successive five year renewal periods. Either party may terminate the agreement, effective upon the last day of a term, by giving notice no later than three years prior to a renewal date. The agreement will also be terminable by mutual consent of the parties or if one party breaches the agreement and does not cure within applicable cure periods and the breach materially and adversely affects the ability of the terminating party to operate its facility. Additionally, the agreement may be terminated in some circumstances if substantially all of the operations at the nitrogen fertilizer plant or the Coffeyville, Kansas refinery are permanently terminated, or if either party is subject to a bankruptcy proceeding or otherwise becomes insolvent.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
March 31, 2014
(unaudited)
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, receivables of $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for amounts yet to be received related to components of the feedstock and shared services agreement other than amounts related to hydrogen sales and pet coke purchases. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, current obligations of $1.3 million and $1.0 million, respectively, were included in accounts payable on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets associated with unpaid balances related to components of the feedstock and shared services agreement, other than amounts related to hydrogen sales and pet coke purchases.
Coke Supply Agreement
CRNF entered into a coke supply agreement with CRRM pursuant to which CRRM supplies CRNF with pet coke. This agreement provides that CRRM must deliver to CRNF during each calendar year an annual required amount of pet coke equal to the lesser of (i) 100 percent of the pet coke produced at CRRM's Coffeyville, Kansas petroleum refinery or (ii) 500,000 tons of pet coke. CRNF is also obligated to purchase this annual required amount. If during a calendar month CRRM produces more than 41,667 tons of pet coke, then CRNF will have the option to purchase the excess at the purchase price provided for in the agreement. If CRNF declines to exercise this option, CRRM may sell the excess to a third party.
CRNF obtains most (over 70% on average during the last five years) of the pet coke it needs from CRRM's adjacent crude oil refinery pursuant to the pet coke supply agreement, and procures the remainder through a contract with HollyFrontier Corporation and on the open market. The price CRNF pays pursuant to the pet coke supply agreement is based on the lesser of a pet coke price derived from the price received for UAN, or the UAN-based price, and a pet coke price index. The UAN-based price begins with a pet coke price of $25 per ton based on a price per ton for UAN (exclusive of transportation cost), or netback price, of $205 per ton, and adjusts up or down $0.50 per ton for every $1.00 change in the netback price. The UAN-based price has a ceiling of $40 per ton and a floor of $5 per ton.
CRNF will pay any taxes associated with the sale, purchase, transportation, delivery, storage or consumption of the pet coke. CRNF is entitled to offset any amount payable for the pet coke against any amount due from CRRM under the feedstock and shared services agreement between the parties.
The agreement has an initial term of 20 years and will be automatically extended for successive five year renewal periods. Either party may terminate the agreement by giving notice no later than three years prior to a renewal date. The agreement is also terminable by mutual consent of the parties or if a party breaches the agreement and does not cure within applicable cure periods. Additionally, the agreement may be terminated in some circumstances if substantially all of the operations at the nitrogen fertilizer plant or the Coffeyville, Kansas refinery are permanently terminated, or if either party is subject to a bankruptcy proceeding or otherwise becomes insolvent.
The cost of pet coke associated with the transfer of pet coke from CRRM to CRNF was approximately $2.2 million and $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Payables of $0.1 million and $0.6 million related to the coke supply agreement were included in accounts payable on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
Environmental Agreement
CRNF entered into an environmental agreement with CRRM which provides for certain indemnification and access rights in connection with environmental matters affecting the Coffeyville, Kansas refinery and the nitrogen fertilizer plant. Generally, both CRNF and CRRM have agreed to indemnify and defend each other and each other’s affiliates against liabilities associated with certain hazardous materials and violations of environmental laws that are a result of or caused by the indemnifying party’s actions or business operations. This obligation extends to indemnification for liabilities arising out of off-site disposal of certain hazardous materials. Indemnification obligations of the parties will be reduced by applicable amounts recovered by an indemnified party from third parties or from insurance coverage.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
March 31, 2014
(unaudited)
The agreement provides for indemnification in the case of contamination or releases of hazardous materials that were present but unknown at the time the agreement was entered into to the extent such contamination or releases were identified in reasonable detail through October 2012. The agreement further provides for indemnification in the case of contamination or releases which occur subsequent to the execution of the agreement.
The term of the agreement is for at least 20 years, or for so long as the feedstock and shared services agreement is in force, whichever is longer.
Services Agreement
CVR Partners obtains certain management and other services from CVR Energy pursuant to a services agreement between the Partnership, CVR GP and CVR Energy. Under this agreement, the Partnership’s general partner has engaged CVR Energy to conduct a substantial portion of its day-to-day business operations. CVR Energy provides CVR Partners with the following services under the agreement, among others:
| |
• | services from CVR Energy’s employees in capacities equivalent to the capacities of corporate executive officers, except that those who serve in such capacities under the agreement shall serve the Partnership on a shared, part-time basis only, unless the Partnership and CVR Energy agree otherwise; |
| |
• | administrative and professional services, including legal, accounting services, human resources, insurance, tax, credit, finance, government affairs and regulatory affairs; |
| |
• | management of the Partnership’s property and the property of its operating subsidiary in the ordinary course of business; |
| |
• | recommendations on capital raising activities to the board of directors of the Partnership’s general partner, including the issuance of debt or equity interests, the entry into credit facilities and other capital market transactions; |
| |
• | managing or overseeing litigation and administrative or regulatory proceedings, establishing appropriate insurance policies for the Partnership and providing safety and environmental advice; |
| |
• | recommending the payment of distributions; and |
| |
• | managing or providing advice for other projects, including acquisitions, as may be agreed by CVR Energy and the Partnership’s general partner from time to time. |
As payment for services provided under the agreement, the Partnership, its general partner or CRNF must pay CVR Energy (i) all costs incurred by CVR Energy or its affiliates in connection with the employment of its employees, other than administrative personnel, who provide the Partnership services under the agreement on a full-time basis, but excluding certain share-based compensation; (ii) a prorated share of costs incurred by CVR Energy or its affiliates in connection with the employment of its employees, including administrative personnel, who provide the Partnership services under the agreement on a part-time basis, but excluding certain share-based compensation, and such prorated share shall be determined by CVR Energy on a commercially reasonable basis, based on the percentage of total working time that such shared personnel are engaged in performing services for the Partnership; (iii) a prorated share of certain administrative costs, including office costs, services by outside vendors, other sales, general and administrative costs and depreciation and amortization; and (iv) various other administrative costs in accordance with the terms of the agreement, including travel, insurance, legal and audit services, government and public relations and bank charges.
Either CVR Energy or the Partnership's general partner may temporarily or permanently exclude any particular service from the scope of the agreement upon 180 days' notice and either CVR Energy or the Partnership's general partner may terminate the agreement upon at least 180 days' notice, but not more than one year's notice. Furthermore, the Partnership's general partner may terminate the agreement immediately if CVR Energy becomes bankrupt or dissolves or commences liquidation or winding-up procedures.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
March 31, 2014
(unaudited)
In order to facilitate the carrying out of services under the agreement, CVR Partners and CVR Energy have granted one another certain royalty-free, non-exclusive and non-transferable rights to use one another’s intellectual property under certain circumstances.
Net amounts incurred under the services agreement for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were approximately $4.0 million and $3.3 million, respectively. Of these charges approximately $3.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively, are included in selling, general and administrative expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization). In addition, $0.9 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of these charges are included in direct operating expenses. For services performed in connection with the services agreement, the Partnership recognized personnel costs of $1.2 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. At each of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, current obligations of $2.8 million and $2.7 million were included in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets with respect to amounts billed in accordance with the services agreement.
GP Services Agreement
The Partnership is party to a GP Services Agreement dated November 29, 2011 between the Partnership, CVR GP and CVR Energy. As payment for services provided under the agreement, CVR Energy must pay a prorated share of costs incurred by the Partnership or its general partner in connection with the employment of the Partnership's employees who provide CVR Energy services on a part-time basis, as determined by the Partnership's general partner on a commercially reasonable basis based on the percentage of total working time that such shared personnel are engaged in performing services for CVR Energy. CVR Energy is not required to pay any compensation, salaries, bonuses or benefits to any of the Partnership’s general partner’s employees who provide services to CVR Energy on a full-time or part-time basis; the Partnership will continue to pay their compensation.
Limited Partnership Agreement
The Partnership's general partner manages the Partnership's operations and activities as specified in the partnership agreement. The general partner of the Partnership is managed by its board of directors. CRLLC has the right to select the directors of the general partner. Actions by the general partner that are made in its individual capacity are made by CRLLC as the sole member of the general partner and not by its board of directors. The members of the board of directors of the general partner are not elected by the unitholders and are not subject to re-election on a regular basis in the future. The officers of the general partner manage the day-to-day affairs of the Partnership's business.
The partnership agreement provides that the Partnership will reimburse its general partner for all direct and indirect expenses it incurs or payments it makes on behalf of the Partnership (including salary, bonus, incentive compensation and other amounts paid to any person to perform services for the Partnership or for its general partner in connection with operating the Partnership). The Partnership reimbursed its general partner for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 approximately $0.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively, pursuant to the partnership agreement for personnel costs related to the compensation of executives at the general partner, who manage the Partnership's business. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, current obligations of $0.1 million and $2.0 million, respectively, were included in personnel accruals on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets related to amounts outstanding in accordance with the limited partnership agreement.
Railcar Lease Agreement
From March 2009 through June 2013, the Partnership leased 199 railcars from American Railcar Leasing, LLC (“ARL”), a company controlled by Mr. Carl C. Icahn, CVR Energy's majority stockholder. The agreement was scheduled to expire on March 30, 2014. On June 13, 2013, the Partnership purchased the railcars from ARL for approximately $5.0 million. Rent expense is included in cost of product sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, $0.3 million of rent expense was recorded related to this agreement.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
March 31, 2014
(unaudited)
Registration Rights Agreement
For the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Partnership recognized approximately $0.3 million in expenses for the benefit of CRLLC in connection with CRLLC’s Secondary Offering in accordance with CVR Partners’ Registration Rights Agreement. These amounts included filing fees, printer fees and external accounting and external legal fees incurred in conjunction with the filing of the registration statement for the Secondary Offering.
Insight Portfolio Group
Insight Portfolio Group LLC ("Insight Portfolio Group") is an entity formed by Mr. Icahn in order to maximize the potential buying power of a group of entities with which Mr. Icahn has a relationship in negotiating with a wide range of suppliers of goods, services and tangible and intangible property at negotiated rates. In January 2013, CVR Energy acquired a minority equity interest in Insight Portfolio Group. The Partnership participates in Insight Portfolio Group’s buying group through its relationship with CVR Energy. The Partnership may purchase a variety of goods and services as members of the buying group at prices and on terms that management believes would be more favorable than those which would be achieved on a stand-alone basis. Transactions with Insight Portfolio Group for each of the years on a gross basis were nominal.
(13) Fair Value Measurements
In accordance with ASC Topic 820 — Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), the Partnership utilizes the market approach to measure fair value for its financial assets and liabilities. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets, liabilities or a group of assets or liabilities, such as a business.
ASC 820 utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:
| |
• | Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities |
| |
• | Level 2 — Other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities) |
| |
• | Level 3 — Significant unobservable inputs (including the Partnership’s own assumptions in determining the fair value). |
The following table sets forth the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by input level, as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2014 |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| (in thousands) |
Financial Statement Caption and Description | | | | | | | |
Cash equivalents (money market account) | $ | 65,304 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 65,304 |
|
Other current liabilities (interest rate swap) | — |
| | 930 |
| | — |
| | 930 |
|
Other long-term liabilities (interest rate swap) | — |
| | 796 |
| | — |
| | 796 |
|
Total Liabilities | — |
| | 1,726 |
| | — |
| | 1,726 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (interest rate swap) | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,726 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,726 |
|
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
March 31, 2014
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| (in thousands) |
Financial Statement Caption and Description | | | | | | | |
Cash equivalents (money market account) | $ | 65,299 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 65,299 |
|
Other current liabilities (interest rate swap) | — |
| | 883 |
| | — |
| | 883 |
|
Other long-term liabilities (interest rate swap) | — |
| | 1,016 |
| | — |
| | 1,016 |
|
Total Liabilities | — |
| | 1,899 |
| | — |
| | 1,899 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (interest rate swap) | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,899 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,899 |
|
As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the only financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis are the Partnership’s money market accounts and derivative instruments. The carrying value of the Partnership’s debt approximates fair value. The Partnership has an interest rate swap that is measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 2 inputs (see Note 10 “Interest Rate Swap Agreements”). The fair values of these interest rate swap instruments are based on discounted cash flow models that incorporate the cash flows of the derivatives, as well as the current LIBOR rate and a forward LIBOR curve, along with other observable market inputs. The Partnership's cash and cash equivalents are all Level 1. The Partnership had no transfers of assets or liabilities between any of the above levels during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes and with the statistical information and financial data appearing in this Report, as well as the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 26, 2014 (the "2013 Form 10-K"). Results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results to be attained for any other period.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Report, including this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains “forward-looking statements” as defined by the SEC, including statements concerning contemplated transactions and strategic plans, expectations and objectives for future operations. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation:
| |
• | statements, other than statements of historical fact, that address activities, events or developments that we expect, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future; |
| |
• | statements relating to future financial performance, future capital sources and other matters; and |
| |
• | any other statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “could,” “should,” “may,” or similar expressions. |
Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by the forward-looking statements we make in this Report, including this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. These statements are based on assumptions made by us based on our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors that we believe are appropriate in the circumstances. Such statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. You are cautioned that any such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those set forth under “Risk Factors” in the Partnership’s 2013 Form 10-K. Such factors include, among others:
| |
• | our ability to make cash distributions on the common units; |
| |
• | the volatile nature of our business and the variable nature of our distributions; |
| |
• | the ability of our general partner to modify or revoke our distribution policy at any time; |
| |
• | the cyclical nature of our business; |
| |
• | the seasonal nature of our business; |
| |
• | the dependence of our operations on a few third-party suppliers, including providers of transportation services and equipment; |
| |
• | our reliance on pet coke that we purchase from CVR Refining; |
| |
• | the supply and price levels of essential raw materials; |
| |
• | the risk of a material decline in production at our nitrogen fertilizer plant; |
| |
• | potential operating hazards from accidents, fire, severe weather, floods or other natural disasters; |
| |
• | the risk associated with governmental policies affecting the agricultural industry; |
| |
• | competition in the nitrogen fertilizer businesses; |
| |
• | capital expenditures and potential liabilities arising from environmental laws and regulations; |
| |
• | existing and proposed environmental laws and regulations, including those relating to climate change, alternative energy or fuel sources, and the end-use and application of fertilizers; |
| |
• | new regulations concerning the transportation of hazardous chemicals, risks of terrorism and the security of chemical manufacturing facilities; |
| |
• | our lack of asset diversification; |
| |
• | our dependence on significant customers; |
| |
• | the potential loss of our transportation cost advantage over our competitors; |
| |
• | our potential inability to successfully implement our business strategies, including the completion of significant capital programs; |
| |
• | our reliance on CVR Energy’s senior management team and conflicts of interest they face operating each of CVR Partners, CVR Refining and CVR Energy; |
| |
• | risks relating to our relationships with CVR Energy and CVR Refining; |
| |
• | control of our general partner by CVR Energy; |
| |
• | our ability to continue to license the technology used in our operations; |
| |
• | restrictions in our debt agreements; |
| |
• | changes in our treatment as a partnership for U.S. federal income or state tax purposes; and |
| |
• | instability and volatility in the capital and credit markets. |
All forward-looking statements contained in this Report speak only as of the date of this document. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this Report, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except to the extent required by law.
Partnership Overview
We are a Delaware limited partnership formed by CVR Energy to own, operate and grow our nitrogen fertilizer business. Strategically located adjacent to CVR Refining’s refinery in Coffeyville, Kansas, our nitrogen fertilizer manufacturing facility is the only operation in North America that utilizes a petroleum coke, or pet coke, gasification process to produce nitrogen fertilizer.
We produce and distribute nitrogen fertilizer products, which are used primarily by farmers to improve the yield and quality of their crops. Our principal products are UAN and ammonia. These products are manufactured at our facility in Coffeyville, Kansas. Our product sales are heavily weighted toward UAN and all of our products are sold on a wholesale basis.
Our facility includes a 1,225 ton-per-day ammonia unit, a 3,000 ton-per-day UAN unit, and a gasifier complex having a capacity of 84 million standard cubic feet per day of hydrogen. Our gasifier is a dual-train facility, with each gasifier able to function independently of the other, thereby providing redundancy and improving our reliability. With the completion of the UAN expansion in February 2013, we now upgrade substantially all of the ammonia we produce to higher margin UAN fertilizer, an aqueous solution of urea and ammonium nitrate which has historically commanded a premium price over ammonia. In 2013, we produced 930,643 tons of UAN and 401,971 tons of ammonia. Approximately 95% of our produced ammonia tons and substantially all of the purchased ammonia were upgraded into UAN in 2013. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, we produced 257,232 tons and
196,157 tons of UAN and 91,025 tons and 111,352 tons of ammonia. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, approximately 92% of our produced and purchased ammonia tons were upgraded into UAN.
We will continue to expand our existing asset base and utilize the experience of our and CVR Energy’s management teams to execute our growth strategy, which includes expanded production of UAN and acquiring and building additional infrastructure and production assets. A significant two-year plant expansion designed to increase our UAN production capacity by 400,000 tons per year, or approximately 50%, was completed in February 2013. Our expanded facility was operating at full rates at the end of the first quarter of 2013.
The primary raw material feedstock utilized in our nitrogen fertilizer production process is pet coke, which is produced during the crude oil refining process. In contrast, substantially all of our nitrogen fertilizer competitors use natural gas as their primary raw material feedstock. Historically, pet coke has been less expensive than natural gas on a per ton of fertilizer produced basis and pet coke prices have been more stable when compared to natural gas prices. By using pet coke as the primary raw material feedstock instead of natural gas, we believe our nitrogen fertilizer business has historically been one of the lower cost producers and marketers of ammonia and UAN fertilizers in North America. We currently purchase most of our pet coke from CVR Refining pursuant to a long-term agreement having an initial term that ends in 2027, subject to renewal. During the past five years, over 70% of the pet coke consumed by our plant was produced and supplied by CVR Refining’s Coffeyville, Kansas crude oil refinery.
CVR Energy, which indirectly owns our general partner and approximately 53% of our outstanding common units, also indirectly owns the general partner and 71% of the common units of CVR Refining. CVR Refining currently owns and operates a complex full coking medium-sour crude oil refinery with a rated capacity of 115,000 barrels per calendar day (bpcd) in Coffeyville, Kansas, a medium complexity crude oil refinery with a rated capacity of 70,000 bpcd in Wynnewood, Oklahoma and ancillary businesses.
Secondary Public Offering
On May 28, 2013, Coffeyville Resources, LLC (“CRLLC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of CVR Energy, sold 12,000,000 of our common units to the public at a price of $25.15 per unit in a registered public offering (the “Secondary Offering”). The net proceeds to CRLLC from the Secondary Offering were approximately $292.6 million, after deducting approximately $9.2 million in underwriting discounts and commissions. We did not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of common units by CRLLC. In connection with the Secondary Offering, the Partnership incurred approximately $0.3 million in offering costs during the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Following the closing of the Secondary Offering and as of March 31, 2014, public security holders held approximately 47% of all outstanding common units and CRLLC held approximately 53% of all outstanding common units and the general partner interest.
Major Influences on Results of Operations
Our earnings and cash flows from operations are primarily affected by the relationship between nitrogen fertilizer product prices, on-stream factors and direct operating expenses. Unlike our competitors, we do not use natural gas as a feedstock and use a minimal amount of natural gas as an energy source in our operations. As a result, volatile swings in natural gas prices have a minimal impact on our results of operations. Instead, CVR Refining’s adjacent refinery supplies us with most of the pet coke feedstock we need pursuant to a 20 year pet coke supply agreement entered into in October 2007. The price at which our products are ultimately sold depends on numerous factors, including the global supply and demand for nitrogen fertilizer products which, in turn, depends on, among other factors, world grain demand and production levels, changes in world population, the cost and availability of fertilizer transportation infrastructure, weather conditions, the availability of imports, and the extent of government intervention in agriculture markets.
Nitrogen fertilizer prices are also affected by local factors, including local market conditions and the operating levels of competing facilities. An expansion or upgrade of competitors’ facilities, international political and economic developments and other factors are likely to continue to play an important role in nitrogen fertilizer industry economics. These factors can impact, among other things, the level of inventories in the market, resulting in price volatility and a reduction in product margins. Moreover, the industry typically experiences seasonal fluctuations in demand for nitrogen fertilizer products.
In addition, the demand for fertilizers is affected by the aggregate crop planting decisions and fertilizer application rate decisions of individual farmers. Individual farmers make planting decisions based largely on the prospective profitability of a harvest, while the specific varieties and amounts of fertilizer they apply depend on factors like crop prices, their current liquidity, soil conditions, weather patterns and the types of crops planted.
Natural gas is the most significant raw material required in our competitors’ production of nitrogen fertilizers. Over the past several years, natural gas prices have experienced high levels of price volatility. However, calendar year 2012 and 2013 were two of the lowest priced years for natural gas prices as compared to the last 10 years. This pricing and volatility has a direct impact on our competitors' cost of producing nitrogen fertilizer.
In order to assess our operating performance, we calculate plant gate price to determine our operating margin. Plant gate price refers to the unit price of fertilizer, in dollars per ton, offered on a delivered basis from the ship point, excluding final shipment costs.
We and other competitors in the U.S. farm belt share a significant transportation cost advantage when compared to our out-of-region competitors in serving the U.S. farm belt agricultural market. In 2013, approximately 53% of the corn planted in the United States was grown within a $45 per UAN ton freight train rate of our nitrogen fertilizer plant. We are therefore able to cost-effectively sell substantially all of our products in the higher margin agricultural market, whereas a significant portion of our competitors’ revenues is derived from the lower margin industrial market. Our products leave the plant either in trucks for direct shipment to customers or in railcars for destinations located principally on the Union Pacific Railroad. We do not currently incur significant intermediate transfer, storage, barge freight or pipeline freight charges. We estimate that our plant enjoys a transportation cost advantage of approximately $15 per UAN ton for transportation of UAN over competitors located in the U.S. Gulf Coast. Selling products to customers within economic rail transportation limits of our nitrogen fertilizer plant and keeping transportation costs low are keys to maintaining profitability. Going forward, as a result of the UAN expansion project completion, we expect to upgrade substantially all of our ammonia production into UAN for as long as it makes economic sense to do so. The value of nitrogen fertilizer products is also an important consideration in understanding our results.
The high fixed cost of our direct operating expense structure also directly affects our profitability. Our facility’s pet coke gasification process results in a significantly higher percentage of fixed costs than a natural gas-based fertilizer plant. Major fixed operating expenses include electrical energy, employee labor, maintenance, including contract labor, and outside services. These fixed costs averaged approximately 83% of direct operating expenses over the 24 months ended March 31, 2014.
Our largest raw material expense is pet coke, which we purchase from CRRM and third parties. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, we spent approximately $3.6 million and $4.0 million, respectively, for pet coke, which equaled an average cost per ton of $29 and $31, respectively.
Consistent, safe, and reliable operations at our nitrogen fertilizer plant are critical to our financial performance and results of operations. Unplanned downtime of the plant may result in lost margin opportunity, increased maintenance expense and a temporary increase in working capital investment and related inventory position. The financial impact of planned downtime, such as major turnaround maintenance, is mitigated through a diligent planning process that takes into account margin environment, the availability of resources to perform the needed maintenance, feedstock logistics and other factors. Historically, the nitrogen fertilizer plant has undergone a facility turnaround every two to three years. The turnaround typically lasts 13-15 days each turnaround year and costs approximately $3.0 million to $5.0 million per turnaround. The nitrogen fertilizer plant underwent a turnaround in the fourth quarter of 2012, at a cost of approximately $4.8 million. The Partnership is planning to defer the next full facility turnaround to 2015. It is anticipated that a less involved facility shutdown will be performed during the second quarter of 2014 to both install a waste heat boiler and upgrade the pressure swing absorption unit, which is projected to increase hydrogen recovery enough to allow us to produce approximately 7,000 to 9,000 tons of additional ammonia fertilizer annually.
Results of Operations
The following tables summarize the financial data and key operating statistics for CVR Partners and our operating subsidiary for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. The following data should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this Report. All information in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” except for the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2013, is unaudited.
To supplement our actual results calculated in accordance with GAAP for the applicable periods, the Partnership also uses certain non-GAAP financial measures, which are reconciled to our GAAP-based results below. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP results.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
| (in millions) |
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data: | | | |
Net sales | $ | 80.3 |
| | $ | 81.4 |
|
Cost of product sold – Affiliates | 2.2 |
| | 3.1 |
|
Cost of product sold – Third Parties(1) | 19.5 |
| | 7.5 |
|
| 21.7 |
| | 10.6 |
|
Direct operating expenses – Affiliates(2) | 0.8 |
| | 1.0 |
|
Direct operating expenses – Third Parties(1) | 23.4 |
| | 21.6 |
|
| 24.2 |
| | 22.6 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses - Affiliates(1)(2) | 3.5 |
| | 4.2 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses - Third Parties(1) | 1.1 |
| | 1.4 |
|
| 4.6 |
| | 5.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization(1) | 6.7 |
| | 5.8 |
|
Operating income | 23.1 |
| | 36.8 |
|
Interest expense and other financing costs | (1.6 | ) | | (1.2) |
|
Interest income | — |
| | — |
|
Other income (expense), net | — |
| | — |
|
Total other income (expense) | (1.6 | ) | | (1.2 | ) |
Income before income tax expense | 21.5 |
| | 35.6 |
|
Income tax expense | — |
| | — |
|
Net income | $ | 21.5 |
| | $ | 35.6 |
|
EBITDA(3) | $ | 29.8 |
| | $ | 42.6 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA(3) | $ | 29.9 |
| | $ | 43.8 |
|
Available cash for distribution(4) | $ | 27.8 |
| | $ | 44.6 |
|
| | | |
Reconciliation of net sales: | | | |
Sales net plant gate | $ | 67.0 |
| | $ | 75.6 |
|
Freight in revenue | 6.9 |
| | 5.7 |
|
Hydrogen revenue | 5.9 |
| | 0.1 |
|
Other | 0.5 |
| | — |
|
Total net sales | $ | 80.3 |
| | $ | 81.4 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| As of March 31, 2014 | | As of December 31, 2013 |
| | | (audited) |
| (in millions) |
Balance Sheet Data: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 85.9 |
| | $ | 85.1 |
|
Working capital | 102.3 |
| | 108.4 |
|
Total assets | 592.6 |
| | 593.5 |
|
Total debt | 125.0 |
| | 125.0 |
|
Total partners’ capital | 430.3 |
| | 439.9 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
| (in millions) |
Cash Flow and Other Data: | | | |
Net cash flow provided by (used in): | | | |
Operating activities | $ | 35.6 |
| | $ | 57.5 |
|
Investing activities | (3.4 | ) | | (18.1 | ) |
Financing activities | (31.4 | ) | | (14.0 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | 25.4 |
|
Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment | $ | 3.4 |
| | $ | 18.1 |
|
______________
|
| |
(1) | Amounts are shown exclusive of depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization is comprised of the |
| following components: |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (in millions) |
| Depreciation and amortization excluded from direct operating expenses | | $ | 6.6 |
| | $ | 5.7 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization excluded from cost of product sold | | 0.1 |
| | — |
|
| Total depreciation and amortization | | $ | 6.7 |
| | $ | 5.7 |
|
| |
(2) | Our direct operating expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 include amounts for share-based compensation, including charges related to CVR Energy's share-based compensation expense allocated to us by CVR Energy for financial reporting purposes in accordance with ASC 718. See Note 3 ("Share‑Based Compensation") to the consolidated financial statements for further discuss of allocated share-based compensation. The charges for share-based compensation in selling, general and administrative expenses were $0.5 million and $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and only nominal charges were included in direct operating expenses. |
| |
(3) | EBITDA is defined as net income before (i) net interest (income) expense, (ii) income tax expense, and (iii) depreciation and amortization expense, which are items management believes affect the comparability of operating results. |
Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA further adjusted for the impact of share-based compensation, non-cash, and, when applicable, major scheduled turnaround expenses and loss on disposition of assets. We present Adjusted EBITDA because it is a key measure used in material covenants in our credit facility and because it is the starting point for calculating our available cash for distribution.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not recognized terms under GAAP and should not be substituted for net income or cash flows from operations. Management believes that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA enable investors and analysts to better understand our ability to make distributions to our common unitholders and our compliance with the covenants contained in
our credit facility. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA presented by other companies may not be comparable to our presentation, since each company may define these terms differently.
A reconciliation of our Net Income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
| (in millions) |
Net income | $ | 21.5 |
| | $ | 35.6 |
|
Add: | | | |
Interest expense, net | 1.6 |
| | 1.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 6.7 |
| | 5.8 |
|
EBITDA | 29.8 |
| | 42.6 |
|
Share-based compensation, non-cash | 0.1 |
| | 1.2 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 29.9 |
| | $ | 43.8 |
|
| |
(4) | The board of directors of our general partner has adopted an amended policy to calculate available cash for distribution starting with Adjusted EBITDA. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, available cash for distribution equaled our Adjusted EBITDA reduced for cash needed for (i) net interest expense (excluding capitalized interest) and debt service and other contractual obligations; (ii) maintenance capital expenditures; and (iii) to the extent applicable, major scheduled turnaround expenses incurred and reserves for future operating or capital needs that the board of directors of the general partner deems necessary or appropriate, if any. Available cash for distribution may be increased by the release of previously established cash reserves, if any, at the discretion of the board of directors of our general partner. |
Available cash for distribution is not a recognized term under GAAP. Available cash for distribution should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net income or operating income, or as any other measure of financial performance or operating performance. In addition, available cash for distribution is not presented as, and should not be considered an alternative, to cash flows from operations or as a measure of liquidity. Available cash for distribution as reported by the Partnership may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other entities; thereby limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.
Below is a table reconciling Adjusted EBITDA to available cash for distribution:
|
| | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 |
| (in millions, except units and per unit data) |
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Available cash for distribution | |
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 29.9 |
|
Adjustments: | |
Less: | |
Net cash interest expense (excluding capitalized interest) and debt service | (1.4 | ) |
Maintenance capital expenditures | (1.0 | ) |
Plus: | |
Distribution of previously established cash reserves, net | 0.3 |
|
Available cash for distribution | $ | 27.8 |
|
Available cash for distribution, per common unit | $ | 0.38 |
|
Common units outstanding (in thousands) | 73,113 |
|
The following tables show selected information about key operating statistics and market indicators for our business:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
Key Operating Statistics | | | |
Production (thousand tons): | | | |
Ammonia (gross produced)(1) | 91.0 |
| | 111.4 |
|
Ammonia (net available for sale)(1)(2) | 8.9 |
| | 30.7 |
|
UAN | 257.2 |
| | 196.2 |
|
Pet coke consumed (thousand tons) | 124.8 |
| | 129.8 |
|
Pet coke (cost per ton)(3) | $ | 29 |
| | $ | 31 |
|
Sales (thousand tons): | | | |
Ammonia | 5.4 |
| | 27.6 |
|
UAN | 254.7 |
| | 194.1 |
|
Product pricing (plant gate) (dollars per ton)(4): | | | |
Ammonia | $ | 479 |
| | $ | 663 |
|
UAN | $ | 253 |
| | $ | 295 |
|
On-stream factors(5): | | | |
Gasification | 98.8 | % | | 99.5 | % |
Ammonia | 92.1 | % | | 98.8 | % |
UAN | 97.0 | % | | 92.8 | % |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
Market Indicators | | | |
Natural gas NYMEX (dollars per MMBtu) | $ | 4.72 |
| | $ | 3.48 |
|
Ammonia — Southern Plains (dollars per ton) | $ | 441 |
| | $ | 696 |
|
UAN — Corn belt (dollars per ton) | $ | 332 |
| | $ | 378 |
|
____________
| |
(1) | Gross tons produced for ammonia represent total ammonia produced, including ammonia that was upgraded into UAN. As a result of the completion of the UAN expansion project in 2013, we expect to upgrade substantially all of the ammonia we produce into UAN. Net tons available for sale represent ammonia available for sale that was not upgraded into UAN. |
| |
(2) | In addition to the produced ammonia, the Partnership acquired approximately 22,900 tons of ammonia during the three months ended March 31, 2014. |
| |
(3) | Our pet coke cost per ton purchased from CVR Refining averaged $24 and $28 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Third-party pet coke prices averaged $40 and $40 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
| |
(4) | Plant gate price per ton represents net sales less freight revenue divided by product sales volume in tons, and is shown in order to provide a pricing measure that is comparable across the fertilizer industry. |
| |
(5) | On-stream factor is the total number of hours operated divided by the total number of hours in the reporting period and is included as a measure of operating efficiency. Excluding the impact of the UAN expansion coming on-line, the on-stream factors for the three months ended March 31, 2013 would have been 99.5% for gasifier, 98.8% for ammonia and 98.3% for UAN. |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
Net Sales. Net sales were $80.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $81.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The decrease of $1.1 million was primarily the result of lower ammonia sales volumes ($15.0 million), lower UAN sales prices ($11.0 million) and lower ammonia sales prices ($1.0 million), partially offset by higher UAN sales volumes ($19.5 million) combined with higher hydrogen sales volumes ($6.2 million). For the three months ended March 31, 2014, UAN and ammonia made up $71.2 million and $2.7 million of our net sales, respectively. This compared to UAN and ammonia net sales of $62.7 million and $18.7 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The following table demonstrates the impact of sales volumes and pricing for UAN, ammonia and hydrogen for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 | Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 | Total Variance | | |
| Volume(1) | $ per ton(2) | Sales $(3) | Volume(1) | $ per ton(2) | Sales $(3) | Volume(1) | Sales $(3) | Price Variance | Volume Variance |
| | | | | | | | | |
UAN | 254,671 |
| $ | 280 |
| $ | 71.2 |
| 194,141 |
| $ | 323 |
| $ | 62.7 |
| 60,530 |
| $ | 8.5 |
| $ | (11.0 | ) | $ | 19.5 |
|
Ammonia | 5,446 |
| $ | 495 |
| $ | 2.7 |
| 27,572 |
| $ | 679 |
| $ | 18.7 |
| (22,126 | ) | $ | (16.0 | ) | $ | (1.0 | ) | $ | (15.0 | ) |
Hydrogen | 578,464 |
| $ | 10 |
| $ | 5.9 |
| 2,713 |
| $ | 11 |
| $ | — |
| 575,751 |
| $ | 5.9 |
| $ | (0.3 | ) | $ | 6.2 |
|
____________
|
|
(1) UAN and ammonia sales volumes are in tons. Hydrogen sales volumes are in MSCF. |
|
(2) Includes freight charges |
|
(3) Sales dollars in millions |
The increase in UAN sales volume for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013 was primarily attributable to the UAN expansion being in operation for the full first quarter of 2014. On-stream factors (total number of hours operated divided by total hours in the reporting period) for the gasification, ammonia and UAN units were 98.8%, 92.1% and 97.0%, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2014.
Plant gate prices are prices at the designated delivery point less the final shipment cost we absorb to deliver the product. We believe plant gate price is meaningful because we sell products both at our plant gate (sold plant) and delivered to the customer’s designated delivery site (sold delivered) and the percentage of sold plant versus sold delivered can change month-to-month or quarter-to-quarter. The plant gate price provides a measure that is consistently comparable period to period. Average plant gate prices for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013 decreased 14.2% for UAN and decreased 27.8% for ammonia, respectively.
Cost of Product Sold (Exclusive of Depreciation and Amortization). Cost of product sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) is primarily comprised of pet coke expense and freight and distribution expenses. Cost of product sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $21.7 million, compared to $10.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The $11.1 million increase resulted from $12.0 million in higher costs from transactions with third parties, partially offset by lower costs from transactions with affiliates of $0.9 million. The higher third-party costs incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2014 were primarily the result of ammonia purchases (approximately 22,900 tons for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and none in the three months ended March 31, 2013), increased railcar repairs and inspections and increased freight costs.
Direct Operating Expenses (Exclusive of Depreciation and Amortization). Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) include costs associated with the actual operations of our plant, such as repairs and maintenance, energy and utility costs, property taxes, catalyst and chemical costs, outside services, labor and environmental compliance costs. Direct operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) for the three months ended March 31, 2014 were $24.2 million as compared to $22.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The $1.6 million increase resulted primarily from higher utilities ($1.6 million), refractory brick amortization ($0.5 million) and catalyst amortization ($0.4 million), partially offset by lower personnel costs ($0.5 million), and insurance ($0.4 million). The increased utility costs were largely due to the UAN expansion, which came on-line in February 2013. The lower labor costs are the result of the higher labor incurred during the UAN expansion project.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (Exclusive of Depreciation and Amortization). Selling, general and administrative expenses include the direct selling, general and administrative expenses of our business as well as certain expenses incurred by our affiliates, CVR Energy and Coffeyville Resources, on our behalf and billed or allocated to us in accordance with the applicable agreements. We also reimburse our general partner in accordance with the partnership agreement for expenses it incurs on our behalf. Reimbursed expenses to our general partner are included as selling, general & administrative expenses from affiliates. Certain of our expenses are subject to the services agreement with CVR Energy and our general partner. Selling, general and administrative expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) were $4.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, as compared to $5.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The decrease of $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013 resulted from a decrease in costs of transactions with affiliates ($0.7 million) and a decrease in costs of transactions with third parties ($0.3 million). The overall variance was primarily the result of a decrease in reimbursements of our general partner ($0.7 million), a decrease in outside services ($0.5 million) and a decrease in share-based compensation ($0.4 million), partially offset by increases in expenses related to the services agreement ($0.5 million).
Operating Income. Operating income was $23.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, as compared to operating income of $36.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The decrease of $13.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013 was the result of the increases in cost of product sold ($11.1 million), increase to direct operating expenses ($1.6 million), depreciation and amortization ($0.9 million) and a decrease in sales ($1.1 million), partially offset by a decrease in selling, general, and administrative expense ($1.0 million).
Interest Expense and Other Financing Costs. Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was approximately $1.6 million as compared to $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was attributable to bank interest expense of $1.2 million on the term loan facility, $0.3 million of interest expense related to the interest rate swap and $0.2 million of deferred financing amortization, partially offset by capitalized interest. The increase in expense as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013 is primarily due to a decrease in capitalized interest associated with the UAN expansion being completed in the first quarter of 2013.
Net Income. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, net income was $21.5 million as compared to $35.6 million of net income for the three months ended March 31, 2013, a decrease of $14.1 million. The decrease in net income was primarily due to the factors noted above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal source of liquidity has historically been cash from operations, which includes cash advances from customers resulting from forward sales. Our principal uses of cash are funding our operations, distributions to common unitholders, capital expenditures and funding our debt service obligations. We believe that our cash from operations, remaining proceeds from the Initial Public Offering, and available borrowings under our revolving credit facility will be adequate to satisfy anticipated commitments and planned capital expenditures for the next twelve months. However, our future capital expenditures and other cash requirements could be higher than we currently expect as a result of various factors. Additionally, our ability to generate sufficient cash from our operating activities depends on our future performance, which is subject to general economic, political, financial, competitive, and other factors beyond our control.
Depending on the needs of our business, contractual limitations and market conditions, we may from time to time seek to issue equity securities, incur additional debt, modify the terms of our existing debt, issue debt securities, or otherwise refinance our existing debt. There can be no assurance that we will seek to do any of the foregoing or that we will be able to do any of the foregoing on terms acceptable to us or at all.
Cash Balance and Other Liquidity
As of March 31, 2014, we had cash and cash equivalents of $85.9 million, including $10.0 million of customer advances. Working capital at March 31, 2014 was $102.3 million, consisting of $138.8 million in current assets and approximately $36.5 million in current liabilities. Working capital at December 31, 2013 was $108.4 million, consisting of $135.8 million in current assets and $27.4 million in current liabilities. As of April 30, 2014, we had cash and cash equivalents of $99.5 million.
Credit Facility
On April 13, 2011 in conjunction with the completion of our Initial Public Offering, we entered into a credit facility with a group of lenders including Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC, as administrative and collateral agent. The credit facility includes a term loan facility of $125.0 million and a revolving credit facility of $25.0 million with an uncommitted incremental facility of up to $50.0
million. There is no scheduled amortization and the credit facility matures in April 2016. The credit facility is used to finance on-going working capital, capital projects, letter of credit issuances and general needs of the Partnership.
Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest based on a pricing grid determined by a trailing four quarter leverage ratio. Pricing for borrowings under the credit facility is currently based on the Eurodollar rate plus a margin of 3.50%, or, for base rate loans, the prime rate plus 2.50%. Under its terms, the lenders under the credit facility were granted a first priority security interest (subject to certain customary exceptions) in substantially all of the assets of CVR Partners and CRNF and all of the capital stock of CRNF and each domestic subsidiary owned by CVR Partners or CRNF. CRNF is the borrower under the credit facility. All obligations under the credit facility are unconditionally guaranteed by CVR Partners and substantially all of our future, direct and indirect, domestic subsidiaries.
As of March 31, 2014, no amounts were drawn under the $25.0 million revolving credit facility.
Mandatory Prepayments
We are required to prepay outstanding amounts under our term facility in an amount equal to the net proceeds from the sale of assets or from insurance or condemnation awards related to collateral, in each case subject to certain reinvestment rights. In addition, we are required to prepay outstanding amounts under our term facility with the net proceeds from certain issuances of debt (other than debt permitted to be incurred under our credit facility).
Voluntary Prepayments/Commitment Reductions
At any time, we may voluntarily reduce the unutilized portion of the revolving commitment amount, or prepay, in whole or in part, outstanding amounts under our credit facility without premium or penalty other than customary "breakage" costs with respect to Eurodollar rate loans.
Amortization and Final Maturity
There is no scheduled amortization under our credit facility. All outstanding amounts under our credit facility are due and payable in full in April 2016.
Restrictive Covenants and Other Matters
Our credit facility requires us to maintain (i) a minimum interest coverage ratio (ratio of Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA to interest) as of the end of any fiscal quarter of 3.0 to 1.0 and (ii) a maximum leverage ratio (ratio of debt to Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA) as of the end of any fiscal quarter of 3.0 to 1.0, in both cases calculated on a trailing four quarter basis. In addition, the credit facility includes negative covenants that, subject to significant exceptions, limit our ability to, among other things:
| |
• | incur, assume or permit to exist additional indebtedness, guarantees and other contingent obligations; |
| |
• | pay dividends or make other distributions; |
| |
• | make payments to our subsidiary; |
| |
• | make certain loans and investments; |
| |
• | consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of our assets; |
| |
• | enter into sale-leaseback transactions; and |
| |
• | enter into transactions with affiliates. |
The credit facility provides that we can make distributions to holders of our common units, but only if we are in compliance with our leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio covenants on a pro forma basis after giving effect to any distribution and there is no default or event of default under the facility.
The credit facility contains certain customary representations and warranties, affirmative covenants and events of default, including, among other things, payment defaults, breach of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to certain indebtedness, certain events of bankruptcy, certain events under ERISA, material judgments, actual or asserted failure of any guaranty or security document supporting the credit facility to be in force and effect, and change of control. An event of default will also be triggered if CVR Energy, CVR Refining or any of their subsidiaries (other than us and CRNF) terminates or violates any of its covenants in any of the intercompany agreements between us and CVR Energy, CVR Refining and their subsidiaries (other than us and CRNF) and such action has resulted or could reasonably be expected to result in a material adverse effect on us. If an event of default occurs, the administrative agent under the credit facility would be entitled to take various actions, including the acceleration of amounts due under the credit facility and all actions permitted to be taken by a secured creditor.
As of March 31, 2014, we were in compliance with the covenants under the credit facility.
Interest Rate Swaps
Our profitability and cash flows are affected by changes in interest rates on our credit facility borrowings, specifically LIBOR and prime rates. The primary purpose of our interest rate risk management activities is to hedge our exposure to changes in interest rates by using interest rate derivatives to convert some or all of the interest rates we pay on our borrowings from a floating rate to a fixed interest rate.
On June 30 and July 1, 2011, CRNF entered into two Interest Rate Swap agreements. We have determined that the Interest Rate Swaps qualify for hedge accounting treatment. The impact recorded for both the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $0.3 million, respectively, in interest expense. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Partnership recorded losses of $0.1 million and $46,000, respectively, in the fair market value on the interest rate swaps. The combined fair market value of the interest rate swaps recorded in current and non-current liabilities at March 31, 2014 is $1.7 million. This amount is unrealized and included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Capital Spending
Our total capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2014 were approximately $3.4 million. We divide our capital spending needs into two categories: maintenance and growth. Maintenance capital spending includes only non-discretionary maintenance projects and projects required to comply with environmental, health and safety regulations. We also treat maintenance capital spending as a reduction of cash available for distribution to unitholders. Growth capital projects generally involve an expansion of existing capacity, improvement in product yields, and/or a reduction in direct operating expenses. Of the $3.4 million spent for the three months ended March 31, 2014, approximately $1.0 million was related to maintenance capital projects and the remainder was related to growth capital projects. Major scheduled turnaround expenses are expensed when incurred.
Our growth strategy includes expanding production of UAN and acquiring additional infrastructure and production assets. In 2013 we completed a significant two-year plant expansion designed to increase our UAN production capacity by 400,000 tons, or approximately 50% per year. Total capital expenditures associated with the UAN expansion were approximately $130.0 million, excluding capitalized interest, of which approximately $14.1 million was spent during the three months ended March 31, 2013, . The UAN expansion construction was completed in February 2013 and our expanded facility was running at full operating rates prior to the end of the first quarter of 2013.
Our future capital spending will be determined by the board of directors of our general partner. Future capital spending estimates may change as a result of unforeseen circumstances and a change in our plans and may be revised from time to time or amounts may not be spent in the manner discussed below. Our maintenance capital expenditures are expected to be approximately $9.0 million to $11.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2014. A less involved facility shutdown is expected to be performed during the second quarter of 2014 to both install a waste heat boiler and upgrade the pressure swing adsorption (“PSA”) unit. The upgraded PSA unit is projected to increase hydrogen recovery enough to allow us to produce approximately 7,000 to 9,000 tons of additional ammonia fertilizer annually, for which we expect the total cost to be approximately $5.0 million to $7.0 million.
Planned capital expenditures for 2014 are subject to change due to unanticipated increases in the cost, scope and completion time for our capital projects. For example, we may experience increases in labor or equipment costs necessary to comply with government regulations or to complete projects that sustain or improve the profitability of our nitrogen fertilizer plant. Capital spending for our business has been and will be determined by our general partner.
Distributions to Unitholders
The board of directors of the Partnership's general partner has adopted a policy for the Partnership to distribute all available cash generated on a quarterly basis. Our policy is disclosed in Note 6 ("Partners’ Capital and Partnership Distributions") to Part I, Item I of this report.
On March 10, 2014, the Partnership paid out a cash distribution to the Partnership's unitholders of record on the close of business on March 3, 2014 for the fourth quarter of 2013 in the amount of $0.43 per common unit, or $31.4 million in aggregate.
On April 30, 2014, the Board of Directors of the general partner of the Partnership declared a cash distribution for the first quarter of 2014 in the amount of $0.38 per common unit, or $27.8 million in aggregate. The cash distribution will be paid on May 19, 2014 to the Partnership's unitholders of record at the close of business on May 12, 2014.
Cash Flows
The following table sets forth our cash flows for the periods indicated below:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
| (in millions) |
Net cash provided by (used in): | | | |
Operating activities | $ | 35.6 |
| | $ | 57.5 |
|
Investing activities | (3.4 | ) | | (18.1 | ) |
Financing activities | (31.4 | ) | | (14.0 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | 25.4 |
|
Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities
For purposes of this cash flow discussion, we define trade working capital as accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable. Other working capital is defined as all other current assets and liabilities except trade working capital.
Net cash flows provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014 were $35.6 million. The positive cash flow from operating activities generated over this period was attributable to net income of $21.5 million, which was primarily driven by strong UAN and hydrogen product volumes, partially offset by a decline in production volumes and higher costs associated with purchases of third party ammonia. With respect to other working capital for the three months ended March 31, 2014, the primary sources of cash were due to changes in other working capital of $14.0 million, primarily due to an increase to deferred revenue of $9.3 million and an increase to accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $3.4 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, fluctuations in trade working capital decreased our operating cash flow by $7.4 million due to a decrease in accounts payable of $3.9 million, an increase in accounts receivable of $3.1 million and an increase in inventory of $0.5 million.
Net cash flows provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2013 were $57.5 million. The positive cash flow from operating activities generated over this period was primarily attributable to net income of $35.6 million and an increase to other working capital, partially offset by unfavorable impacts to trade working capital. The increase to net income was driven by higher UAN sales volumes associated with the UAN expansion, which was partially offset by a slight decline in overall UAN prices. With respect to other working capital for the three months ended March 31, 2013, the primary sources of cash were a $27.6 million increase in deferred revenue, partially offset by the decrease to accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $1.2 million. Deferred revenue represents customer prepaid deposits for the future delivery of our nitrogen fertilizer products.
For the three months ended March 31, 2013, trade working capital decreased our operating cash flow by $11.4 million and was primarily attributable to an increase in accounts receivable of $4.6 million, an increase in inventory of $3.3 million and a decrease in accounts payable of $3.5 million.
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $3.4 million compared to $18.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, net cash used in investing activities is primarily the result of capital expenditures. The decrease in capital expenditures during the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared against 2013 is primarily the result of the UAN expansion project.
Cash Flows Used in Financing Activities
Net cash flows used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014 were $31.4 million, compared to net cash flows used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2013 of $14.0 million. The net cash used in financing activities for three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was primarily attributable to quarterly cash distributions.
Contractual Obligations
As of March 31, 2014, our contractual obligations included long-term debt, operating leases, unconditional purchase obligations, other specified capital and commercial commitments and interest payments. There were no material changes outside the ordinary course of our business with respect to our contractual obligations during the three months ended March 31, 2014, from those disclosed in our 2013 Form 10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any "off-balance sheet arrangements" as such term is defined within the rules and regulations of the SEC.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies are disclosed in the “Critical Accounting Policies” section of our 2013 Form 10-K. No modifications have been made to our critical accounting policies.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
The Partnership has exposure to interest rate risk on 50% of its $125.0 million floating rate term debt. A 1% increase over the Eurodollar floor spread of 3.5%, as specified in the credit facility, would increase interest cost to the Partnership by approximately $625,000 on an annualized basis, thus decreasing net income by the same amount.
Our credit facility is disclosed in Note 9 ("Credit Facility") and our interest rate swap agreements are disclosed in Note 10 ("Interest Rate Swap Agreements") to Part I, Item I of this Report.
Commodity Price, Foreign Currency Exchange and Non-Operating Risks
We do not currently use derivative financial instruments to manage risks related to changes in prices of commodities (e.g., UAN, ammonia or pet coke). Given that our business is currently based entirely in the United States, we are not directly exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk. We do not engage in activities that expose us to speculative or non-operating risks, including derivative trading activities. In the opinion of our management, there is no derivative financial instrument that correlates effectively with, and has a trading volume sufficient to hedge, our firm commitments and forecasted commodity purchase or sales transactions. Our management will continue to monitor whether financial derivatives become available which could effectively hedge identified risks and management may in the future elect to use derivative financial instruments consistent with our overall business objectives to avoid unnecessary risk and to limit, to the extent practical, risks associated with our operating activities.
CVR PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of March 31, 2014, we have evaluated, under the direction of our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon and as of the date of that evaluation, our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Partnership’s management, including our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. It should be noted that any system of disclosure controls and procedures, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any system of disclosure controls and procedures is based in part upon assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Due to these and other inherent limitations of any such system, there can be no assurance that any design will always succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no material change in our internal control over financial reporting required by Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See Note 11 (“Commitments and Contingencies”) to Part I, Item I of this Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Part II, Item 1, for a description of certain litigation, legal and administrative proceedings and environmental matters.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the “Risk Factors” section of our 2013 Form 10-K.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
| |
Exhibit Number |
Exhibit Title |
| |
10.1* | Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Services Agreement, dated February 17, 2014 by and among CVR Partners, LP, CVR GP, LLC and CVR Energy, Inc. |
31.1* | Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
31.2* | Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
32.1* | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
32.2* | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
101* | The following financial information for CVR Partners, LP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, filed with the SEC on May 2, 2014, formatted in XBRL (“Extensible Business Reporting Language”) includes: (1) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited), (2) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited), (3) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited), (4) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited), (5) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Partners’ Capital (unaudited) and (6) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), tagged in detail. |
_________ * |
Filed herewith. |
PLEASE NOTE: Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC, we may file or incorporate by reference agreements referenced as exhibits to the reports that we file with or furnish to the SEC. The agreements are filed to provide investors with information regarding their respective terms. The agreements are not intended to provide any other factual information about the Partnership or its business or operations. In particular, the assertions embodied in any representations, warranties and covenants contained in the agreements may be subject to qualifications with respect to knowledge and materiality different from those applicable to investors and may be qualified by information in confidential disclosure schedules not included with the exhibits. These disclosure schedules may contain information that modifies, qualifies and creates exceptions to the representations, warranties and covenants set forth in the agreements. Moreover, certain representations, warranties and covenants in the agreements may have been used for the purpose of allocating risk between the parties, rather than establishing matters as facts. In addition, information concerning the subject matter of the representations, warranties and covenants may have changed after the date of the respective agreement, which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in the Partnership’s public disclosures. Accordingly, investors should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants in the agreements as characterizations of the actual state of facts about the Partnership or its business or operations on the date hereof.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| | CVR Partners, LP |
| | | |
| | By: | CVR GP, LLC, its general partner |
| | | |
May 2, 2014 | | By: | /s/ JOHN J. LIPINSKI |
| | | Chairman of the Board of Directors, Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President |
| | | (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | | |
May 2, 2014 | | By: | /s/ SUSAN M. BALL |
| | | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| | | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
| | | |
UAN 2014 - Exhibit 10.1
AMENDMENT TO
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED SERVICES AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is entered into as of February 17, 2014 by and between CVR Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership ("MLP"), CVR GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("GP"), and CVR Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("CVR", and collectively with MLP and GP, the "Parties" and each, a "Party").
RECITALS
The Parties entered into a Second Amended and Restated Services Agreement effective as of May 4, 2012 (the "Agreement"), pursuant to which CVR agreed to provide the Services to the Services Recipients. The Parties desire to amend the Agreement in the manner set forth in this Amendment.
The parties agree as follows:
1.Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.
2.Terms. The definition of “Share-Based Compensation” contained in Section 1.01 of the Agreement is amended and restated to read as follows:
"Share-Based Compensation" means any compensation (whether equity or cash) accruing or payable under any incentive or other compensation plan or program of an employer (including, without limitation, the CVR Energy, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan) based upon changes in the equity value of such employer or any of its Affiliates (but excluding the MLP, CVR Refining, LP and their respective subsidiaries).
3.Payment Amount. Section 3.01 of the Agreement is amended and restated to read as follows:
"Section 3.01 Payment Amount. GP shall pay or cause MLP or Fertilizer to pay, to CVR (or its Affiliates as CVR may direct) the amount of any direct or indirect expenses incurred by CVR or its Affiliates in connection with the provision of Services by CVR or its Affiliates (the "Payment Amount"), in accordance with the following:
(a)Seconded Personnel. The Payment Amount will include all Personnel Costs of Seconded Personnel, to the extent attributable to the periods during which such Seconded Personnel are provided to the Services Recipients.
(b)Shared Personnel and Administrative Personnel. The Payment Amount will include a prorata share of all Personnel Costs of Shared Personnel and Administrative Personnel (including government and public relations), as determined by CVR on a commercially reasonable basis, based on the percent of total working time that such respective personnel are engaged in performing any of the Services.
(c)Administrative Costs. The Payment amount will include the following:
(i)Office Costs. A prorata share of all office costs (including, without limitation, all costs relating to office leases, equipment leases, supplies, property taxes and utilities) for all locations of Administrative Personnel, as determined by CVR on a commercially reasonable basis, based on the Fertilizer Payroll Percentage;
(ii)Insurance. Insurance premiums will be direct charged to the applicable insured to the extent possible, and otherwise will be allocated on a commercially reasonable basis as mutually agreed upon by the Parties;
(iii)Outside Services. Services provided by outside vendors (including audit services, legal services, government and public relation services, and other services) will first be direct charged where applicable, provided, however, the Payment Amount will include a prorata share of charges for all services that are provided by outside vendors and not direct charged, as determined by CVR on a commercially reasonable basis, based on the estimated portion of such services that are for the benefit of the Services Recipients;
(iv)Other SGA Costs. A prorata share of all other sales, general and administrative costs relating to the Services Recipients, as determined by CVR on a commercially reasonable basis, based on the estimated portion of such services that are for the benefit of the Services Recipients; and
(v)Depreciation and Amortization. A prorata share of depreciation and amortization relating to all locations of Administrative Personnel, as determined by CVR on a commercially reasonable basis, based on the Fertilizer Payroll Percentage, following recognition of such depreciation or amortization as an expense on the books and records of CVR or its Affiliates.
(d)Other Costs. Bank charges, interest expense and any other costs as reasonably incurred by CVR or its Affiliates in the provision of Services will be direct charged as applicable. For the avoidance of doubt, any of the foregoing costs and expenses described in Section 3.01 that are direct charged to any Party will not be included in the Payment Amount."
4.Effective Date. Each of the amendments contemplated by this Amendment is effective as of January 1, 2014 (the "Effective Date").
5.Ratify Agreement. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement will remain unamended and in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. The amendments provided herein will be limited precisely as drafted and will not constitute an amendment of any other term, condition or provision of the Agreement. References in the Agreement to "Agreement", "hereof", "herein", and words of similar import are deemed to be a reference to the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.
6.Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original and all of which constitute one agreement that is binding upon each of the parties, notwithstanding that all parties are not signatories to the same counterpart.
[signature page follows]
The parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above, but effective as of the Effective Date.
|
| | | |
CVR Partners, LP By: CVR GP, LLC, its general partner
| CVR GP, LLC |
By: | /s/ Stanley A. Riemann | By: | /s/ Susan M. Ball |
Name: | Stanley A. Riemann | Name: | Susan M. Ball |
Title: | Chief Operating Officer | Title: | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
| |
CVR Energy, Inc.
|
By: | /s/ John J. Lipinski |
Name: | John J. Lipinski |
Title: | Chief Executive Officer and President |
UAN 2014 - Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, John J. Lipinski, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of CVR Partners, LP;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for the registrant and have:
a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
| |
By: | /s/ JOHN J. LIPINSKI |
| John J. Lipinski |
| Chief Executive Officer of CVR GP, LLC, |
| the general partner of CVR Partners, LP |
Date: May 2, 2014
UAN 2014 Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Susan M. Ball, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of CVR Partners, LP;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for the registrant and have:
a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
| |
By: | /s/ SUSAN M. BALL |
| Susan M. Ball |
| Chief Financial Officer of CVR GP, LLC, |
| the general partner of CVR Partners, LP |
Date: May 2, 2014
UAN 2014 Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of CVR Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John J. Lipinski, Chief Executive Officer of CVR GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
|
| |
By: | /s/ JOHN J. LIPINSKI |
| John J. Lipinski |
| Chief Executive Officer of CVR GP, LLC, |
| the general partner of CVR Partners, LP |
Dated: May 2, 2014
UAN 2014 Exhibit 32.2
Exhibit 32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of CVR Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Susan M. Ball, Chief Financial Officer of CVR GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
|
| |
By: | /s/ SUSAN M. BALL |
| Susan M. Ball |
| Chief Financial Officer of CVR GP, LLC, |
| the general partner of CVR Partners, LP |
Dated: May 2, 2014